I think soem one need to look up the meaning of the word "facetiously".
If you want more than one wife to nag you and if you can afford more than one wife to spend your money and more than one wife's parent and family to worry about - fine with me! But, FRANKLY, I think you are NUTS!!!!!!!!!!! [img]confused.gif[/img] [img]graemlins/wilted.gif[/img] [img]graemlins/thumbs_down.gif[/img]
I think soem one need to look up the meaning of the word "facetiously".
<font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">I would handle it like the Chinese. The number one wife is in charge of the other wives, she controls the money and the spending of the others. She is also the one that runs interference so the others get to nag her.Originally posted by Sluggo:
But, FRANKLY, I think you are NUTS!!!!!!!!!!! [img]confused.gif[/img] [img]graemlins/wilted.gif[/img] [img]graemlins/thumbs_down.gif[/img]
Of course the number one wife gets special compensations. As she is the oldest and we have been together the longest, she is probably looking at the pool boy with some interest. Now if number two and number three are keeping me happy, then I will not be inclined to worry about what number one is doing.
And as far as affording them, if all four work then I could spend my days riding and fishing.
<font color="#000002" size="1">[ May 21, 2004 03:59 PM: Message edited by: travelinman ]</font>
<<contemplating>>
Let's see...
I get the young, lithe, six pack ab poolboy(s).
Trav gets 3 or women PMSing at the same time.
I get to be in charge.
No more cleaning...
No more laundry...
No more yardwork...
I'm in!
I think this is a great idea.
Bump if you think it's time to stand up, be counted, write your congresspersons, and demand the right to marry more than one woman!
Why not? Maybe the current Mrs. Joe Republc would appreciate some help around the house.
Again, why not? After all....
- It doesn't HURT anyone.
- It only affects what happens in the bedroom.
- It's a PRIVATE matter.
- Only narrow-minded Christians have insisted on this in the past.
- We are broad-minded and advanced enough as a culture to handle this. Forget the lessons of the past. In fact, don't even look at tradition.
- If we ask the Mass. Supreme Court to look into it, I'm sure it's constitutional.
- If Adam and Steve can do it, why can't Joe R. and Brittany and Tiffany?
Again, it's my OWN business, and who does it HURT?
Let's have a National Call for Polygamy Day. How about June 21, the day after Father's Day? Let's all call Congress, ABC, NBC, CBS, the local paper, and DEMAND the right to marry more than one woman.
Oh, and let's not forget to call NOW, Ms. magazine, and maybe Barbara Walters.
In the meantime, I'll look for a bigger bed...
Facetiously yours,
-- Joe
Just move to Utah...
Personally I'm not even too keen on ever being married, but several wives? How ghastly.
Should we allow people with multiple personalities to marry themselves? [img]eek.gif[/img] [img]confused.gif[/img] LOL!
<font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">It would not be as difficult as you may think. It's not like you go out and marry all 4 at once, you stagger them. I think when the 1st wife understands she is not being replaced, but is actually getting more security and freedom she will help you in the selection of the rest. After all it would be in her best interest to make sure she is in charge of this.Originally posted by Jumper69:
Yeah, I mean other than the infantismal likelyhood of finding women who would be okay with polygamy, what's the problem?
[img]biggrin.gif[/img]
<font color="#000002"><font size="1">[ May 25, 2004 12:53 PM: Message edited by: Jumper69 ]</font></font>
<font color="#000002" size="1">[ May 25, 2004 01:07 PM: Message edited by: travelinman ]</font>
<font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">Perhaps you should give us some good reasons why this shouldn't be legal. Violating tradition isn't a good reason, and one can argue that there's plenty of tradition to support such a thing.Originally posted by travelinman:
I think this is a great idea.
Bump if you think it's time to stand up, be counted, write your congresspersons, and demand the right to marry more than one woman!
Why not? Maybe the current Mrs. Joe Republc would appreciate some help around the house.
Again, why not? After all....
- It doesn't HURT anyone.
- It only affects what happens in the bedroom.
- It's a PRIVATE matter.
- Only narrow-minded Christians have insisted on this in the past.
- We are broad-minded and advanced enough as a culture to handle this. Forget the lessons of the past. In fact, don't even look at tradition.
- If we ask the Mass. Supreme Court to look into it, I'm sure it's constitutional.
- If Adam and Steve can do it, why can't Joe R. and Brittany and Tiffany?
Again, it's my OWN business, and who does it HURT?
Let's have a National Call for Polygamy Day. How about June 21, the day after Father's Day? Let's all call Congress, ABC, NBC, CBS, the local paper, and DEMAND the right to marry more than one woman.
Oh, and let's not forget to call NOW, Ms. magazine, and maybe Barbara Walters.
In the meantime, I'll look for a bigger bed...
Facetiously yours,
-- Joe
So far, you've offered nothing.
Bookmarks